Leonora Ann Darby, the executive producer of the horror hit Obsession, has filed a lawsuit against Tea Shop Productions. The complaint names James Harris and Mark Lane as the primary defendants. Darby alleges that she was promised one-third of the net profits from films she lead-produced. The core of the suit hinges on the claim that Obsession was not covered by the written agreement governing profit sharing. The lawsuit argues that the specific project fell outside the scope of the contract, leaving Darby without her expected financial stake in a successful title. Tea Shop Productions has not yet issued a public statement. The legal filing positions the case as a breach of contract, asserting that the exclusion of Obsession from the written terms was a material deviation from the original promise. For a horror franchise or standalone hit, net profit participation is a critical revenue stream for producers. Darby’s claim that the film was omitted from the written agreement suggests a dispute over the definition of 'lead-produced' projects. The defendants, Harris and Lane, are the named parties responsible for the production entity. The legal strategy focuses on the gap between the verbal or implied promise of one-third net profits and the actual written document. The lawsuit seeks to rectify this discrepancy, arguing that the exclusion was not a mere oversight but a significant contractual breach. As Obsession continues to generate revenue as a horror hit, the financial stakes for Darby’s claim are substantial. The court will need to determine if the written agreement’s scope was too narrow to capture the project in question. This legal move highlights the frequent friction between production entities and producers regarding financial transparency and profit distribution. The case is expected to draw attention to how horror studios structure backend deals with their key creative personnel. Darby’s position is that her work on Obsession met the criteria for lead producer status, which should have triggered the profit participation clause. The defendants may argue that the written agreement explicitly listed certain films, and Obsession was not on that list. The outcome could set a precedent for similar disputes in the horror industry. With the film performing well at the box office, the net profits at stake are a major motivating factor in this litigation. The lawsuit is currently pending, and both sides are preparing for discovery and potential mediation. The horror community is watching closely, as producer profit participation is a hot-button topic in independent and genre filmmaking.